Categories: Uncategorized

Real Times Radio Broadcast

Categories: RADIO

“HILLARY AT CHIPOTLE”

 

 

 

 pic_giant_041615_SM_Hillary-Chipotle-Cam

Today’s Quote

We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” -Hillary Clinton

 

 

 

 

Time Check

April 23, 1789 -President Washington moved into Franklin House, New York. It was the first executive mansion.

April 23, 1900 – The word “hillbilly” was first used in print in an article in the “New York Journal.” It was spelled “Hill-Billie”.

April 23, 1945 – The Soviet Army fought its way into Berlin.

real time

Iss. 38

April 23, 2015

Dear Thinkers,

There has been a great deal of fallout in wake of Mrs. Hillary Clinton’s announcement to run for President of the United States. As I sit down to write this article, I realize that this is not only my first column which features the former First Lady, but surely the first of many to come in the following year. 

What I did not expect, however, was the subject of which I am about to cover. Chipotle. 

After Clinton admitted to running in 2016−something that the whole country had anticipated for years—She hopped on a bus straight for Iowa; the first of many battleground states. 

As you may not know, the trip is very long, about 12 hours… so as one would Imagine, you would have to make a few stops. One of these happened to be at a Chipotle.

Upon service, Clinton wasn’t recognized by the employees. It wasn’t until afterwards from a security camera, that Clinton was identified wearing sunglasses at the register. Now, one must realize at this point, that it would be almost unavoidable for Clinton to escape criticism of some sort, no matter where she chose to eat that day, and we will certainly cover that, but let us first state the facts. 

-Hillary Clinton (as stated in here announcement video) plans to run a campaign for the average citizen, and to topple the wealthy.

-Many of these average citizens undeniably work at Chipotle. 

-Clinton didn’t leave one nickel (out of her 5-50M net worth) as a tip for the Chipotle workers that day.

-Clinton’s average price per speech is 200,000 dollars. (Some can be much, much, more-CBS News) In the last 15 months she has pulled in around a net 5 million dollars on speeches alone (MotherJones). 

-Following the visit she was condemned by Jeb Bush as he implied that she was too good for other fast food restaurants and had to pick (high end) Chipotle.

So there you have it, those are the facts. And before you jump to emotional conclusions and start attacking her or defending her based on personal inclination, let me keep it real here. 

First off Jeb, at least she didn’t do this:

obama-chipotle-wh-photo

Secondly, a main talking point of the GOP calls her health into question. An honest man would applaud her healthy choice, especially on a road trip where variety is not always a luxury. 

But one cannot deny the irony behind running a campaign based on the working man/woman, yet hours later ignoring the very person you say you are running for. However, even the most generous tippers in this world would be found guilty if the standard was to leave a tip in every establishment entered. 

Could it be possible that Clinton did not have cash in her wallet at the time? Of course! Any reasonable human being knows this happens from time to time. Furthermore, had it crossed the minds of the drones in the press that Clinton may have not seen the service fit for a tip? It is after all a tip, isn’t it?

For those who think I am making excuses for Mrs. Clinton, I ask you this: If you are able to draw conclusions based on the absence of fact, is it then unfair for me to entertain the possibilities above? Any honest being knows that these scenarios are just as likely. And I may very well be wrong, but one must recognize that both arguments are in fact, speculation, and nothing more than that, which on The Real Times, does not constitute news. 

That being the case Thinkers, there is still plenty to discuss. 

In accord to the real facts, conjecture aside, Clinton claims to represent the working class. Whether she had tipped at Chipotle or not, her policy instead speaks for itself.

Hillary Clinton believes not in redistributing wealth through a tip jar, but through the hands of the federal government, and as the executive, I remind you, those will be her hands if elected. This is why it should not come as a surprise that Hillary Clinton didn’t tip, and if she did, it would be meaningless to her disposition on the issue…. The media does not need to look to Chipotles on the road to Iowa just to find a story here, but instead my friends, they could listen to the rhetoric of her speeches for the last decade which echo top down redistribution of wealth in its most raw form.  (See Today’s Quote )

Clinton vows to destroy the 1 percent, yet she sits at the very top of the 1 percent—not just financially, but also on a throne as arguably the most powerful woman in the world, making her, according to her own words, directly responsible for the policies that are apparently holding people back. You may forget, she did recently occupy the white house for a long time, which in my humble opinion would make her not “the average citizen”. But who better to look out for YOU, the average citizen, than someone better than you? Someone who the rules don’t apply to…

“But I am already generous,” you may say. But remember, until the money goes through her hands, you’re not smart enough to be generous. So hold your tips friends, Hillary has you covered, you just have to trust her. 

Bottom line, let people enjoy their Chipotle, and go after their politics.

Not their burritos. 

 

Keep it Real

Unknown

Christian Rogers

The Real Times- a degree in common sense…

                                   Meanwhile at Subway…

 

Catch Real Times Radio Live 24/7 or On Demand

E-mail me any questions or comments at christianrogers@realtimesblog.com

Or click on Leave a Comment below and let me know what you think

A special thanks to everyone for reading. Please forward this issue to anyone who you think could benefit. Or sign up on the website for your free weekly issues. Until then, I will see you next time!

Categories: Political, Real Time (Articles) | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

What does Rand Paul and President Obama have in Common? Is College Spring Break Out of Control?

Categories: RADIO

radionomy background

 

 

 

Categories: Uncategorized

Real Times RADIO

Real Times Radio

Categories: Uncategorized

“REAL TIMES RADIO BROADCAST 12/2/14″

 

 

Categories: RADIO | Tags: , , , , , , ,

“BAD ENERGY”- What you don’t know about Solar Panels

Solar panel and sun

Today’s Quote

“It’s really kind of cool to have solar panels on your roof” -Bill Gates

Time Check

Nov 21, 1620 – The Mayflower reached Provincetown, MA. The ship discharged the Pilgrims at Plymouth, MA, on December 26, 1620. 

Nov 21, 1694 – French author and philosopher Jean Francois Voltaire was born. At age 65 he spent only three days writing “Candide.”

Nov 21, 1877 – Thomas A. Edison announced the invention of his phonograph. 

real time

Iss. 37

November, 21, 2014

Dear Thinkers,

Green Energy has become such a sexy phrase. Millions and millions of Americans have become seduced by the allure of this giant political movement. Even I must admit, I have come to be more or less infatuated with the idea of clean energy. And who could blame us? The intent is noble right?

Also there is a great debate in this country about the efficiency of alternate forms of energy, specifically solar, and as I noted, I would be a large proponent of it if solar was efficient. But the truth is, Solar energy is not efficient. Not even close. And if it were, then we wouldn’t be having the debate in this country about whether we should use solar energy or not….we would instead already be using it. But it’s the cool thing right?

Debate aside, let’s keep it real and just look at the facts.

Not only has solar energy proved itself to be insufficient, but I must question as to whether the green flag that it so often flies is an accurate representation. We take for granted the fact that “Going Green” means helping the environment, but let me ask you, what exactly does that mean?

I am under the impression that animal life and safety carries a lot of weight in the environmentalist circles… Well is that the real case? Or is this a front that gets the dog lovers to the voting booths in November? I will let you decide, but what often goes ignored is the fact that solar plants incinerate birds on a daily basis. And if killing birds is the collateral for saving the environment, are we not contradicting ourselves? The death tolls are catastrophic. It is estimated that a given solar plant incinerates a whopping 30 birds per hour. No not per month. Not week, and no, not day… I said per hour. Where is PITA on this issue and the rest of the left? I would think there would be an outcry! Not to mention my dear thinkers, each one of these plants uses an astronomical amount of water not only to run the turbines and create energy, but also to clean and hose down the panels whenever desert dust happens to gather as a film and hinder the energy creating process.

Many of these plants are located in the middle of the desert which not only means that dust will surely collect often, but additionally, it costs large sums of money to truck in water using several hundred vehicles (which do expel carbon) whenever this task is at hand. Aside from the inconvenience, does anyone remember, WE ARE IN A DROUGHT? Why is it that California legislatures can present laws that regulate the length of your showers and the time of day that you can water your lawn, when thousands of gallons are being wasted on solar panels all of the time.

In hindsight, I have no agenda in lobbying for or against solar energy. I would just like to advocate a simple piece of truth: THAT WE AREN’T BEING TOLD THE WHOLE TRUTH. There aren’t videos on the nightly news of innocent birds catching fire while quietly flying across the desert. And the environmentalists who yell at us about saving the birds and conserving water will just as quickly look the other way when it conflicts with their other agendas. And as a Conservative who is supposed to “hate the environment”, I kindly ask us to stop watering things that cause death, and instead maybe water a tree or two… something green couldn’t hurt.

Just a thought.

 

Christian Rogers

The Real Times- a degree in common sense…

Sign your friends up at the top ^

E-mail me any questions or comments at christianrogers@realtimesblog.com

Or click on Leave a Comment below and let me know what you think

A special thanks to everyone for reading. Please forward this issue to anyone who you think could benefit. Or sign up on the website for your free issues. Until then, I will see you next time!

Categories: Real Time (Articles) | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Real Times Radio Broadcast 11/6/14

Categories: RADIO | Tags: , , , , , ,

“DOES GENDER STILL EXIST?”

Paper Dolls 2

 

 

 

Today’s Quote

Gender is a reality, and a more fundamental reality than sex.”  -C.S. LEWIS

 

Time Check

Oct. 20, 1803- The U.S. Senate authorized the Louisiana purchase.

Oct 20, 1910- A baseball with a cork was used in a world series game for the first time.

Oct 20, 1944- Allied forces invade the Philippines in WWII. 

 

 

real time

Iss. 36

October 20, 2014

 

Dear Thinkers,

It appears that everything done in America these days is done in the name of tolerance. This is especially true in the public education system where an unofficial, yet not subtle, competition wages daily based on the premise of “Who is more consciously tolerant”.  This goes without suggesting the ramifications of being pegged intolerant.

Now what does being tolerant mean? To be quite honest, the word, like many other politically charged words, actually has very little meaning in itself. Instead, promoting tolerance in schools, the workplace, and in everyday life, gives meaning to a certain brand of people and in turn makes them feel important. I’d like to draw your attention now to the hypocrisy of these people, and how quickly they will unknowingly contradict themselves in the name of this divisive word.

This morning, I was directed to an article which reported on two U.S. all-Female colleges that have now decided to adopt policies in admitting “male transgender students”.  Meaning that these are girls who have in essence, declared themselves boys, or boys who have declared themselves girls (or someone who identifies as neither sex). The two schools are Mills College in Oakland, CA and Mount Holyoke College in South Hadley, MA and many are expected to soon follow this hot new trend. 

According to The College Fix, ( http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/19615/ )Mount Holyoke’s President Lynn Pasquerella said, “Just as early feminists argued that reducing women to their biological functions was a foundation of women’s oppression, we acknowledge that gender identity is not reducible to the body”. This would in turn enable coed bathrooms, as well as several other complications that I don’t need to spell out for you. 

Now here is where this sick philosophy falls apart, 

I would then ask Ms. Pasquerella, if you hold the belief that gender is “not reducible to the body”, then how is it possible for you to operate your college under the premise that it is an all girls school? If there is no difference between men and women, I should just as easily have a chance of being admitted as any other female student on that campus—Actually, I should have a better chance—much better in fact! Due to the over saturation of women on the campus, it would only seem fair to admit me, a male student, to make the campus socially diverse. But you see, this is why this piece of leftist ideology doesn’t work just like every single other: If gender does not carry any relevance, then affirmative action, at least in the case of our gender debate, should be repealed immediately. Getting rid of gender is a double edged sword for these people. And they will just as easily justify forcing you to fill out your gender on a college application so that they can unfairly admit more women just to hit diversity quotas as they will justify telling us that you can pick your gender to walk into coed bathrooms. These two thoughts cannot live together, but it never seems to bother academia one bit and I’ll tell you why. Academics don’t care about true fairness and acceptance, they already know that we don’t have that problem on a major scale here in America. Unfortunately, and not surprisingly, these moronic ideas sprout to carry out an agenda and in doing so they don’t find problems in the slightest with contradicting themselves because they are side tracked by the overall goal of all liberals: “Winning the TOLERANT contest”. 

Thinkers, we are on the verge of eliminating men and women in the name of tolerance. But apparently, my opinion is intolerable? This hypocrisy my friends, is why you shall not find me applying to either one of those institutions. These people are tearing the country apart at its seams and I advise you not to disagree with me, because it would consequently make you intolerant. 

 

Christian Rogers

 

The Real Times- a degree in common sense…

 

Sign your friends up at the top ^

E-mail me any questions or comments at christianrogers@realtimesblog.com

Or click on Leave a Comment below and let me know what you think

A special thanks to everyone for reading. Please forward this issue to anyone who you think could benefit. Or sign up on the website for your free issues. Until then, I will see you next time!

Categories: Political, Real Time (Articles) | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Adventure Journal by Contexture International.